Home » Government & Administrative Law » Question
USPS employee was sent for a fitness of duty for driving after he filed for FERS disability from his employer. The examining doctor agreed that employee should not drive but then recommended employe
Write Your Full Question Here
USPS Employee clocked out on his own due to driving hazardously. His doctors agreed employee suffers from PTSD and that he should not be driving. Also, recommended different job with less stress. Employee then filed for FERS disability from OPM. While waiting for OPM to make a decision on employees disability, local manager decided to send employee for a fitness of duty for not being able to drive. Employee went to the fitness for duty "for driving" and examining doctor agreed that employee should not drive. Then, examining FFD doctor recommended employee to another follow up FFDE with a psychiatrist. Is this procedure legal? (Employer knew that his doctors have stated that he has PTSD and should separate from his job when then sent employee for FFDE) Doesn't this violate ADA and the rehabilitation act?
Asked in Government & Administrative Law - 747 days ago
Tags: USPS employee was sent for a fitness of duty for driving after he filed for FERS disability from his employer. The examining doctor agreed that employee should not drive but then recommended employe
Ask a Question
Categories
Related Links
